7/6/2013: Weekend Reading Links: Part 2

In the previous post I have compiled some reading links for the weekend: http://trueeconomics.blogspot.ie/2013/06/762013-weekend-reading-links-part-1.html

As promised, here is a follow up second post with the rest of links.


The world of clocks and daggers is, it turns out, also the world of some appreciation for the arts. As reported here: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/06/analyst-who-cracked-kryptos/ the CIA staff has finally cracked the code of the Jim Sanborn's cryptographic sculpture at the CIA’s HQs. It took 8 years and then it took another 25 years for the fact to be revealed to the public. But even more fascinatingly, one last coded section of the sculpture is yet to be deciphered…


Not exactly art or science, but Apple is a leading light in the world of design-driven approach to manufacturing. It has been brilliant, irreverent, non-standard and always expressive through out decades. It has also been a brand icon for creative industries )rows of Macs on ad agencies desks) and as such it is associated with the very iconic anti-IBM commercial that launched it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjyrqVgWPXY.

But now, Apple is the new IBM… http://blog.stephengates.com/2010/04/12/welcome-to-1984-how-apple-has-become-the-new-ibm/ and worse, it is anti-Apple too, for the man who did this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXGrVEnKDko would have probably never been hired into Apple today: http://venturebeat.com/2013/06/03/if-steve-jobs-applied-for-a-job-at-apple-today-theres-no-chance-in-hell-hed-get-hired/ .


The next link, as I promised not to do anything 'economics'-wise, is not so much about economics of something, but rather economics as a field of inquiry. Anyhow, I find it intelligently written and actually quite good: http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/06/should-we-trust-economists/276497/


Two related articles on art of light:
http://www.theartnewspaper.com/articles/What-happens-when-the-lights-go-out/29752
and
http://www.theartnewspaper.com/articles/Flavins-will-see-the-light-of-day/29751

I prefer Dan Flavin's works: here he is in his symmetric error of homage to Tatlin: http://www.moma.org/collection/object.php?object_id=81337

Of course, irony has it, Tatlin was asymmetric: http://kdigital.tumblr.com/post/576318843/model-for-the-monument-to-the-third-international It always puzzled me why in all of his homages to Tatlin (of which Flavin made 8) he was always symmetric in interpreting Tatlin's tower. All said, here's Flavin at his best http://www.davidzwirner.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/33-400x266.jpg

And finally - another reminder - I will be taking part in http://www.rar.ie/ on Thursday 13 June, 2013, from 8.00pm – 2.30am.


Have a great weekend and stay tuned - there will be economics posts on the blog.

26/5/2013: Corporate Tax Haven Ireland Weekly Links Page

"Taxes are not up to Google," Schmidt reiterated. "If the international tax regime changes we will follow. But virtually all American companies have structures like this; this is how the international tax regime works. The fact of the matter is if we pay more tax in one area, we pay less somewhere else."

Thus spoke Eric Schmidt of Google (http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-05/22/eric-schmidt-tax) and guess what: he is right. Google is not breaking the law. It is the law that allows for countries, like Ireland, to follow beggar thy neighbour economic policies and strategies.

The issue is not the low tax rate, but the fact that various loopholes allow companies operating - allegedly in Ireland - to channel revenues from other countries into Ireland. This is not about exports from Ireland, and it is not about low tax regime in Ireland. When an MNC books revenue earned somewhere else to Dublin, MNC is not break a law. Instead, Ireland is facilitating transfer of funds that relate to value added activity elsewhere to its own economy. This, in the nutshell, summarises the entire nature of Irish economic development strategy: take value added from somewhere else and appropriate it as Irish.


And in the spirit of usual weekly posts (see thread start on Irish Corporate Tax Haven here: http://trueeconomics.blogspot.ie/2013/05/1452013-corporate-tax-haven-ireland.html ): in this week, it is virtually impossible to list all Tax Haven Ireland links from around the world in a post, but here are some:

• http://www.irishexaminer.com/business/eu-eyes-tax-residency-law-change-232325.html
• several listed here: http://trueeconomics.blogspot.ie/2013/05/26052013-ireland-hard-at-work-on-troika.html
• An important link from March 2013: http://www.finfacts.ie/irishfinancenews/article_1025752.shtml
• Noonan's feeble defence of the regime he claims doesn't exist: http://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/oireachtas/us-senate-committee-quoted-incorrect-tax-rates-for-apple-activities-here-d%C3%A1il-told-1.1404834
• And here is an 'official' admission that we might change that which, allegedly, does not need to be changed because it is not an 'Irish' problem: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/26/us-ireland-tax-reform-idUSBRE94P04820130526?feedType=RSS&feedName=businessNews
• Of course, the problem does not exist: http://www.rte.ie/news/2013/0522/451805-tax-ireland-apple/
• But things are smelling of some smoke: http://www.euronews.com/2013/05/22/ireland-branded-tax-haven-ahead-of-eu-summit-on-tax-evasion/
• and the smoke ain't white: http://venturebeat.com/2013/05/22/ireland-were-no-tax-haven-but-yes-apple-did-pay-2-tax/
• Vincent Browne wades in with some good links: http://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/government-zealously-protects-the-wealthy-in-ireland-s-wild-west-tax-haven-1.1401752
• Recall Budget 2013 'Strategy' on Corporate Tax (betcha you didn't know we had this strand of thinking flowing through...) http://budget.gov.ie/budgets/2013/Documents/Budget%202013%20-%20Presentation%20on%20Corporation%20Tax%20and%20FDI.pdf
• IDA Tax 'Guide" from 2012: http://www.idaireland.com/news-media/publications/library-publications/ida-ireland-publications/IDA_Tax_2012.pdf you have to love Figure 3:

• Accountants' view: http://www.annebrady.ie/page6/page35/page91/page91.html Note that 'statutory transparency and uniformity' principle really is not what is being used as core discriptor of Irish regime...
• An interesting 2012 document from IAM on the value of tax regime to Ireland's capacity to attract FDI - as in tax being a singularly most important factor http://www.iamireland.ie/dashboard//upload/134522238057FDI_and_Tax_16th_August_2012.doc
• Jim Stewart's paper on Irish Corporation Tax regime: http://www.tcd.ie/iiis/documents/discussion/pdfs/iiisdp375.pdf This concluded that "The corporate tax rate in Ireland is often described at the ‘cornerstone’ of industrial policy. This paper argues that excessive reliance on tax reliefs and on the attraction/retention of foreign direct investment has led to the development of certain tax haven type features for the Irish economy. Tax haven type features are in turn at variance with the development of sustainable firms."
• CS Monitor article on Google and Apple cases: http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2013/0521/Google-Apple-draw-transatlantic-ire-over-double-Irish-tax-haven
• Counterbalance from one of the few knowledgeable people on the subject: http://www.independent.ie/business/irish/peter-vale-five-reasons-why-ireland-is-not-a-tax-haven-29287879.html

I shall stop there, for now...

25/5/2013: Saturday Reading Links

Some interesting reading links:

FT Weekend edition has a full supplement on Venice Biennale 2013 - no link, but here's the official page: http://www.labiennale.org/en/art/exhibition/index.html?back=true


A fascinating article from The Economist on the movement toward technology displacing 'knowledge' workers next: http://www.economist.com/news/business/21578360-brain-work-may-be-going-way-manual-work-age-smart-machines

This cuts across my own view that we are seeing rising complementarity between technology and human capital, as opposed to substitutability thesis advanced in the article. The Economist view is thought provoking, for sure.


At last, there is a proof of the theorem that postulates that gaps between prime numbers are bounded: http://blogs.ethz.ch/kowalski/2013/05/21/bounded-gaps-between-primes/ and more on same http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/do_the_math/2013/05/yitang_zhang_twin_primes_conjecture_a_huge_discovery_about_prime_numbers.single.html


An excellent piece on the changes big data is bringing to economics - not from the point of view of new studies directions, but from the point of view of verifiability: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/economics-blog/2013/may/17/economic-big-data-rogoff-reinhart?CMP=twt_gu
There added 'bonus' points in the article discussing overall relationship between the research recognition, rewards and background work.


And a brilliant example of just how atavistic and primitive is the understanding of the web-based and mobile-platformed services in the top political echelons in Europe:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/electronics/10054717/France-preparing-tax-on-Apple-and-Google-to-fund-culture.html
Apparently, dinosaurs in French political elites have trouble comprehending just how revolutionary to culture and its creators (artists, thinkers, analysts, developers etc) Apple 'i'- and Google platforms are. It is highly likely that iTunes, for example, are doing more to distribution of Francophone music across the world than the entire Ministry of 'French' Culture. Then again, the entire tax debate in Europe is never about culture or arts or anything tangible, but about finding ever more elaborate and bizarre paths for milking the economy to sustain ever expanding state.


While on topic of matters European, a fascinating study on genetic persistency in European populations covered in http://www.presseurop.eu/en/content/article/3770411-europeans-we-re-all-kissing-cousins
Given it comes from the US (original home to Apple and Google), may be the French can pay a special levy to the US for bothering to include their subjects in global research? Afterall, shall they fail to pay up, ignoring France should not be that hard - it works in geopolitics and economics, after all...